Protocols About 2 min read

Web and messaging protocols

These interfaces carry requests and events between applications. Choose a delivery mechanism, then define message meaning, permissions, retries and recovery.

Overview#

This section covers the general purpose transports and encodings used to connect access control systems, video platforms, intercoms, intrusion systems, cloud services, and automation consumers. It focuses on developer visible contracts and defensive integration behaviour.

Reading map#

Module Use it for
HTTP and REST HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, HTTP/3, resource modeling, retries, caching, authorisation, and safe client behaviour
SOAP and XML SOAP envelopes, WSDL contracts, XML Schema, namespaces, faults, and hardened XML processing
WebSocket, SSE, and webhooks Bidirectional sessions, server to browser streams, and server to server event callbacks
MQTT Brokered telemetry/events, sessions, QoS, retained state, topic design, and ACLs
AMQP 1.0 Brokered or peer messaging with links, credit, settlement, transactions, TLS, and SASL
CoAP, OSCORE, and LwM2M Constrained request/response, object security, observation, and device management profiles
CAP and EDXL emergency messaging Public warning and emergency information envelopes, lifecycle, profiles, and delivery boundaries
gRPC and serialisation Typed RPC, streaming, Protocol Buffers, JSON, and CBOR evolution and parser safety

Choose by interaction shape#

Need Typical fit Important caveat
Request/response resource API HTTP with a documented REST style contract REST is an architectural style, not a wire standard or automatic security property
Contract first XML operations SOAP/WSDL Harden every XML parser; schema validity is not authorisation
Long lived bidirectional messages WebSocket Define an application subprotocol, flow control, liveness, and reauthentication
One way browser event stream SSE It is server to client only and reconnects automatically
Server to server event push Webhook Assume retries and duplicates; authenticate the message and constrain callback destinations
Many producers/consumers through a broker MQTT QoS does not make business side effects exactly once
Brokered queues, routing, and link settlement AMQP 1.0 Settlement is a messaging outcome, not proof of downstream physical handling
Constrained device request/observe CoAP with an explicit security/profile design A CoAP ACK is not proof of application or physical outcome
Typed internal RPC and streaming gRPC Deadlines, compatibility rules, and message size bounds are part of the API contract

Cross cutting contract#

For every integration, document:

  • protocol/version and transport security profile;
  • endpoint and trust boundary ownership;
  • client/service identity, authentication, and per operation authorisation;
  • schema version and compatibility rules;
  • timeout, retry, idempotency, ordering, duplicate, and backpressure behaviour;
  • maximum request/message/field/depth/stream duration;
  • timestamp, clock skew, replay, correlation, and event ID semantics;
  • redaction, retention, audit, privacy, and incident behaviour;
  • degraded operation and recovery after network partition, credential rotation, or restart.

Example and verification policy#

Examples use synthetic identifiers, documentation domains, and RFC documentation addresses. Don't paste production credentials, tokens, certificates, device identifiers, or callback URLs into them. V1 on this index denotes navigation review; child pages use V2 for standards based technical claims, while deployment evidence remains separately scoped.